Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft
List Comments
12 comments.
Respondent | Response Date | Details |
---|---|---|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Development Management Policies SP1
Support
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Development Management Policies SP1
Support
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities DM74
Not sound
Not consistent with national policy
Comments:
Any green space of value that is considered worthy of protection should be justified and designated as such under Policy DM73 Local green space.
Suggested change:
Delete Policy DM74.
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Living within Environmental Limits DM19
Not sound
Not consistent with national policy
Comments:
The policy indicates that financial contributions will be sought where it is not possible, practical or desirable to make provision for green infrastructure on sites of 10 or more dwellings.
The Glossary (page 174) defines Green infrastructure as comprising: "the strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features and includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities DM74
Not sound
Not consistent with national policy
Comments:
Any green space of value that is considered worthy of protection should be justified and designated as such under Policy DM73 Local green space.
Suggested change:
Delete Policy DM74.
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Transport DM23
Support
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivery DM75
Where a development site is formed by more than one ownership the council will seek to ensure that effective collaborative procedures are in place in the planning and delivery of development. A lack of effective collaboration, particularly on larger more complex schemes may be a reason for refusal.
Not sound
Not consistent with national policy
Comments
A lack of co-operation from one landowner should not prevent development proceeding providing the whole site has been comprehensively planned
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Transport DM24
Development giving rise to a significant number of travel movements will only be permitted if it is inter alia not likely to lead to an unacceptable degree of traffic congestion.
Not sound
Not consistent with national policy
Comments:
This does not appear to be consistent with NPPF Paragraph 32 which states that: "Development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of development are severe."
Suggested change:
Substitute "unacceptable
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Appendix: Schedules Schedule 3
Schedule 3: Proposed sites for mixed use developments - lists Moor Lane, Backwell as a new allocation - 55 dwellings and 1 hectare of employment land
Proposals will need to consider biodiversity and railway noise and include mitigation measures where appropriate.
Not sound
Not justified
Comments
The scale of the employment land component appropriate to this scheme will only become clearer once further detailed work is undertaken, bearing in mind that this site has been allocated for employm
|
Deleted User | 18 Apr 2013 | Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33
See letter and plan attached.
|