Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

9 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Employment in Weston-super-Mare WSM19

  • Comment ID: 1074881//2
  • Status: Accepted
Policy WSM19: Employment-led Regeneration at Weston Villages Origin3 objects to this policy on the grounds that it is premature, inappropriate, and repeats unnecessarily the provisions of Policy CS28 and CS30. First, Policies CS28 and CS30 are two of those remitted to the Planning Inspectorate for re-examination. For reasons outlined elsewhere, we consider it likely that there will be a substantial increase in total housing provision in North Somerset. Whether or not this might result in the a
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Development Management Policies SP1

  • Comment ID: 1074881//3
  • Status: Accepted
Policy SP1: Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development Origin3 welcomes the inclusion of this policy in the Plan and its prominent position in it as a statement of intent. We note that it includes part of National Planning Policy Framework paragraph 14 as a direct quotation. However, such a policy will have little value (and indeed would not fulfill the Government's intentions) if the rest of the development plan includes negative and inappropriate policies; or, to use the words of parag
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Transport DM20

  • Comment ID: 1074881//4
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM20 and DM21: Major Highway Schemes and Motorway Junctions Origin3 supports proposed Policy DM21 as the improvements to M5 Junction 21 are vital to the successful implementation of Weston Villages and therefore the strategy as a whole. Likewise, support is given to the consistent identification of the Junction 21 Relief Road through the Core Strategy and now Policy DM20.
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Transport DM21

  • Comment ID: 1074881//5
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM20 and DM21: Major Highway Schemes and Motorway Junctions Origin3 supports proposed Policy DM21 as the improvements to M5 Junction 21 are vital to the successful implementation of Weston Villages and therefore the strategy as a whole. Likewise, support is given to the consistent identification of the Junction 21 Relief Road through the Core Strategy and now Policy DM20.
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 1074881//6
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM33: Settlement Boundaries Origin3 objects to Policy 33 and its associated depiction on the Proposals Map of the settlement boundary around Weston Parklands. Origin3 has consistently highlighted shortcomings in the delineation of the settlement boundary in this location. Origin3 noted the evidence of officers at the Core Strategy Examination that the detailed boundary would need to respond to detailed masterplan work. Origin3 has also sought the Council's evidence base for the detailed
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Dwellings in the Countryside DM48

  • Comment ID: 1074881//7
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM48: Strategic Gaps Origin3 objects to Policy DM48. It finds its practical expression on the Proposal Map but is premature in relation to its linkage with Policy CS19, one of a number of policies remitted to the Planning Inspectorate for re-examination following the partly successful challenge to the Core Strategy. We consider the width of the strategic gap to the north of Weston Parklands to be excessive, and given the importance of suitably located land near junction 21 for business p
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering a Prosperous Economy DM51-52

  • Comment ID: 1074881//8
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM51: Allocated Mixed Use Sites Origin3 notes that Weston Parklands appears second on the list of such sites in Schedule 3. We object to this policy on the grounds that the Proposals Map, as it does in respect of DM33 and the settlement boundary, shows an inappropriate extent of development for the reasons set out above. For those same reasons we consider this policy to be also premature.
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM34

  • Comment ID: 1074881//1
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM34: Housing Allocations Origin3 objects to this policy on the grounds that it unsound. DCLG has withdrawn the unrounded 2008 based household projections, extending to 2033, from its website and replaced them with a medium term set with a base date of 2011 and running to 2021. Although this does not cover the whole plan period of the Core Strategy, the new data indicate clearly that the total provision of 14,000 dwellings is likely to be wholly inadequate. The new figures show an incre
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Retailing, Town, District and Local Centres DM70

  • Comment ID: 1074881//9
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM70: Air Safety Origin3 objects to the final paragraph of Policy DM70. The safeguarded corridor to which it refers and as defined on the Proposals Map is inconsistent with the more general nature of the low fly rules and goes beyond the requirements of the FATO. The safeguarded corridor as defined will have a unnecessarily inhibiting effect on the potential for development, particularly commercial development (new strategic employment) in the vicinity.