Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

7 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering a Prosperous Economy DM51-52

  • Comment ID: 8140353//4
  • Status: Accepted
DM51 Allocated Mixed-Use Sites and Schedule 3 Persimmon supports the allocation of Winterstoke Village, land at Summer Lane, Land to the West of Winterstoke Road, Weston-super-Mare, Elliott Medway at Congresbury and in principle Woodborough Farm, Winscombe. In respect of the land to the West of Winterstoke Road, as with all the mixed-use allocations, more work is required to determine the precise mix of uses and the exact capacity for each of the various uses. We note that the Policy identifie
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities DM74

  • Comment ID: 8140353//5
  • Status: Accepted
DM74 Undesignated Open Space Persimmon consider Policy DM74 is not fully justified by a "robust and up to date Assessment of the needs for open space, sports and recreation facilities", as required by Paragraph 73 of the NPPF.
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Employment in Weston-super-Mare WSM19

  • Comment ID: 8140353//6
  • Status: Accepted
Policy WSM19 Employment-Led Regeneration at Weston Villages This Policy built on previous discussions between Developers and the Council on the delivery of the employment-led approach for Weston Villages. We have 3 specific comments on the Policy as it is drafted: 1. Clauses b, d and f all refer to use of a S106 Agreement and Planning Conditions. We consider this should refer to a S106 Agreement or Planning Conditions and the preference would be to use a S106 route to be more appropriate than
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Service and Infill Villages W1

  • Comment ID: 8140353//7
  • Status: Accepted
Policy W1 Woodborough Farm, Winscombe We support in principle the identification of the mixed-use allocation at Woodborough Farm. It is a sustainable location with the Strawberry Line providing a safe and convenient route to the Village Centre and as such is the most sustainable, undeveloped location in Winscombe. However, we consider there should be flexibility and a range of uses to be located on the land and in particular the suitability of the site could be one use which needs further inves
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8140353//1
  • Status: Accepted
DM33 Settlement Boundaries Whilst we have no specific comments on the settlement boundaries as currently defined, other than those on Weston-super-Mare contained in separate Representations submitted by Pegasus and on Backwell and Portishead submitted by Turleys, it may be necessary to revise the boundaries should additional housing numbers need to be identified. There are potential extensions available in the most sustainable Service Villages which would be suitable, available and deliverable
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM34

  • Comment ID: 8140353//2
  • Status: Accepted
DM34 Housing Allocations There is a need to review the housing allocations in the light of the Judicial Review to the Core Strategy. Core Strategy Policy CS32 defines the Service Villages. These are by definition appropriate locations for development. However, there is very little capacity for even limited development within the defined limits of all these settlements, but they are suitable and sustainable opportunities for small scale development adjacent to the defined boundaries. If the Rev
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM35

  • Comment ID: 8140353//3
  • Status: Accepted
DM35 Housing Type and Mix Persimmon considers it is not right to rely on new sites to specifically redress any imbalance in the existing housing stock. New housing sites can only have a minimal impact in achieving this requirement through the development of specific sites. It is more important that new housing is allocated and delivered in accordance with the SHMA to provide the opportunity for movement in the local housing market in the area where the site is located, so that any imbalances ar