Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

55 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8134689//1
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM33: Settlement Boundaries First Step Homes (Wessex) Ltd request that the settlement boundary for Backwell be amended to include land currently outside of but abutting the settlement boundary, relating to the area safeguarded for the proposed primary school playing field to the south of Dark Lane together with the extent of land (edged red in the attached plan and to be read in conjunction with the attached additional information) to the south of Dark Lane, Backwell. It is further reco
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 6250657//1
  • Status: Accepted
REPRESENTATIONS TO SITE AND POLICIES PLAN (FEBRUARY 2013) We make the following comments on behalf of Alvis Brothers and Mr A Hill. The Council will be aware that through representations to the on-going Core Strategy examination we are promoting the need for a Green Belt review to include land south and east of Pill. The North Somerset Sites and Policies DPD is intended to provide detailed policy guidance (including site allocations) to secure the implementation of the North Somerset Core St
Wraxall and Failand Parish Council 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 7800929//2
  • Status: Accepted
Wraxall & Failand Parish Council supports: b. the maintenance of corridors between settlements and especially between Nailsea and Long Ashton. (DM33)
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8140321//1
  • Status: Accepted
See attached document and map.
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 1074881//6
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM33: Settlement Boundaries Origin3 objects to Policy 33 and its associated depiction on the Proposals Map of the settlement boundary around Weston Parklands. Origin3 has consistently highlighted shortcomings in the delineation of the settlement boundary in this location. Origin3 noted the evidence of officers at the Core Strategy Examination that the detailed boundary would need to respond to detailed masterplan work. Origin3 has also sought the Council's evidence base for the detailed
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8140353//1
  • Status: Accepted
DM33 Settlement Boundaries Whilst we have no specific comments on the settlement boundaries as currently defined, other than those on Weston-super-Mare contained in separate Representations submitted by Pegasus and on Backwell and Portishead submitted by Turleys, it may be necessary to revise the boundaries should additional housing numbers need to be identified. There are potential extensions available in the most sustainable Service Villages which would be suitable, available and deliverable
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8134145//1
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM33 - Settlement Boundaries * Bleadon Parish Council strongly supports the existing Settlement Boundary in Bleadon and accepts the adjustment at Bleadon Quarry. * We consider that possible assessment sites SHL72 and SHL98 should be excluded from Development Allocations as these are quite clearly outside the Bleadon Settlement Boundary
backwellresidents 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 928033//3
  • Status: Accepted
B.1.3 Settlement Boundary: In the period to 2026 there should neither be, nor is there any need, for any amendment to the Settlement Boundary with adequate land available within the existing limits to meet the CS scale of development. In the event of a Review, resulting from major improvements in both the national and local economies, and a resulting step-change increase of numbers of dwellings throughout the NSC district, the village is capable of meeting such a challenge from within its Sett
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8142177//4
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM33: Settlement boundaries The list of settlement boundary changes should include adjustment to the boundary at Nailsea to include land to the south-west of Nailsea between the existing urban boundary and Youngwood Lane (see response to Policy DM34 above for full details).
Deleted User 19 Apr 2013

Sites and Policies Plan Consultation Draft Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities DM33

  • Comment ID: 8135777//1
  • Status: Accepted
We write on behalf of Mr R. Davies the owner of the land highlighted in red on the attached plan extract. As identified by other agents who have submitted representations to this consultation we question the appropriateness of progressing this consultation on the Sites and Policies Plan when further housing may be required and a Green Belt review may be undertaken to meet the required housing needs of the district. On behalf of Mr Davies we promote the removal of the land at the centre of Cleev
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page