North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

208 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
S and D Williams 04 Jan 2016

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 10315841//1
We understand that the Core Strategy on housing numbers for North Somerset is yet to be adopted with a shortfall of some 1715 houses to be identified. We hope that the small village of Backwell is not one expected to accommodate further housing over and above the sites already identified, where the schools, road and medical are already at capacity. This was supported by Backwell's Neighbourhood Plan which clearly stated that public opinion was against any major housing development. Backwell al
Churchill Parish Council 21 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1190177//1
Churchill PC wholly supports CS32 and the protection it provides to Service Villages from speculative development both within and without settlement boundaries.  It is essential for any developments to be meet identified local housing needs in respect of affordability and and dwelling mix, be plan led and supported by the community. 
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Introduction

  • Comment ID: 1026369//2
We believe the strategy is well set out and although the 20,985 figure is somewhat disappointingly high, North Somerset Council have distributed the housing in a well thought out structured approach. We are alarmed that there will be another review before the end of 2018 and, in particular, NSC Council having to work with Bristol Council who in our view are driven by profit, and a mayor who is a complete moron and does not listen at all to the people who elected him.
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 1026369//4
We are pleased that the settlement boundaries will remain unchanged, We believe this is the correct approach and trust North Somerset Council will honour this although we believe NSC will be pressured by developers to change this.
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 1026369//5
It is vital the council do protect strategic gaps to help retain the separate identity, character and/or landscape setting of settlements and distinct parts of settlements. We are nothing like our neighbouring council authorities and we dont want to be, North Somerset Council makes its decisions in the interest of its residents, authorioties such as Bristol City Coucil most certainly do not
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1026369//3
We believe CS32 policy of small scale development within the identified service villages to be the correct approach and the best way for housing distribution. The pressure from developers to make large new urban areas for easy profit must be resisted.
Mr M Orr 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Introduction

  • Comment ID: 9143233//1
see attached for all policy responses
Weston Town Council 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Introduction

  • Comment ID: 7777185//1
The Town Council wishes to make the following comments on this consultation: 1. While Weston is arguably not very affected by the latest changes to the Core Strategy (in that it is already taking a large share of new housing development) the larger villages do need to accept more of the required increase in housing development. 2. There should be an amendment to the Green Belt boundary at South Bristol to allow housing development between the current urban boundary and the new A370 to A38 link
terry@puryend 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Introduction

  • Comment ID: 14344577//1
I wholly support CS32 and the protection it provides to Service Villages from speculative development both within and without settlement boundaries. It is essential for any developments to meet identified local housing needs in respect of affordability and dwelling mix, be plan led and supported by the community. 
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Introduction

  • Comment ID: 14352161//1
These additional housing numbers are being forced on North Somerset by central Government, due to unsustainable population influx to the UK. It is unclear how numbers may be affected in 2017 if the UK votes to leave/remain in the EU.  
Next pageLast page