North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

46 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 05 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 10224513//1
Please accept this final comment on the Core Strategy: * Backwell's NP, a major feature of the Government's Localism polices, clearly states public opinion is against a major housing expansion in the village. * The NP identifies traffic congestion in the village as a significant problem which would only be exacerbated by further development. Similarly local schools and medical facilities are already at capacity.    * With the exception of the site in Moor Lane (which is already allocated for
Deleted User 03 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 10275201//1
I am writing to emphasise that Backwell should not be asked to absorb a large housing development. We have just completed our Neighbourhood Plan, which had overwhelming support for limited housing developments - of the order of 50 homes. The NP identifies traffic congestion in the village as a significant problem which would only be exacerbated by further development. Similarly local schools and medical facilities are already at capacity.The site in Moor Lane (which is already allocated for dev
Backwell Residents Association 03 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 9072129//2
Backwell Residents Association represents over 500 residents in the village.  We are responding to the request for final comments on those unadopted sections of the Core Strategy which relate to housing numbers in the period to 2026. We have obtained the views of our members who are overwhelmingly against any proposal to develop significant new housing in the Parish. Backwell's Neighbourhood Plan, only adopted in March of this year, and which is now a binding part of Planning legislation, form
Congresbury Parish Council 26 Nov 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 7688737//1
Congresbury Parish Council supports the aims of the revision to CS32, especially the emphasis being placed on identified local housing need in respect of affordability or dwelling mix and ensuring that developments are supported by the local community. The Parish Council supports the proposal that any changes to the settlement boundary must be plan led through the allocation in the Sites and Policies DPD or a Neighbourhood Development Plan which the parish is currently working towards through th
N Cooper 19 Nov 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14206753//2
CS32 is well drafted and, I believe, if applied rigorously it will have strong support in the respective communities, who will support development that respects the letter and spirit of CS32 There are a host of applications that have been submitted in Yatton, and likely other Service Villages, which do not satisfy any of the criteria for support, accordingly they should be rejected.
Deleted User 16 Nov 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14185505//2
I fully support CS32 and its intentions. To this end I would point out that the majority of the flood of planning applications affecting Yatton and Congresbury are outside their village boundaries and are not supported by local residents. All these applications should be rejected to preserve these village communities and ensure their village infrastructure is not overwhelmed.
First pagePrevious page