North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

23 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 4602593//3
The figures referred to should be expressed as minimum figures and the opportunity should be taken for the District Council to promote higher levels of housing in sustainable locations such as Nailsea.  The District Council need to widen their narrow focus on Weston and consider how the promotion of higher housing figures at Nailsea, coupled with associated infrastructure, could ensure that these settlements have a future.  The need for additional housing in settlements outside Weston needs to b
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 14340929//5
The policy is sound, but it has already been undermined by unsound implementation, viz the granting of consent for significant new development outside the settlement boundary in several locations, which was not supported by the local community as policy requires.  Yatton is a case in point and this Council has supported the objections of Yatton PC in relation to the unaaceptable impacts on infrastructure and services. The recent appeal decision in relation to a proposal for development in Congre
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 14341953//2
I support this, development has to be strictly within village boundaries.  Valuable countryside must be protected.  The heart of villages must be protected from greedy developers.  There are plenty of unused industrial sites around North Somerset, prime for development, which are being ignored due to costs.
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 930433//3
Policy CS14: Distribution of New Housing 3.2       Obviously the distribution of housing is to be adjusted in the light of the confirmed CS13     target of 20,985 dwellings. 3.3       The changes to this policy, and the consequential changes that are made to CS28, CS30,       CS31, CS32 and CS33, are not the subject of any evidence or justification that is apparent in        the information available for this consultation. It may be that NSC has relied upon information/evidence prepared in rel
Mike Highfield (Somerset Count… 14 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 8350689//1
My comment relates to the effectiveness of Policy CS14 to highlight potential issues that might arise when noise sensitive development is located in areas where it might then restrict associated land uses.  Policy CS14: Distribution of new housing indicates 'Priority will be given to the re-use of previously developed land. In all cases, new housing development must not conflict with environmental protection, Green Belt, nature conservation or any other relevant policies of the Development Plan
Nailsea Town Council 14 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 706241//2
Nailsea Town Council requests that the following wording is added after the sentence in policy CS14 which ends 'or in Nailsea through site allocations outside the Green Belt': "However, minor changes to the precise Green Belt boundary to allow development otherwise consistent with the Core Strategy and to extend protection elsewhere will be adopted."
Deleted User 11 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 9141697//3
Support new housing development at Yatton with good transport links to Weston and Bristol with a new MetroBus corridor to Clevedon.  Support new housing around Pill with the Portishead railway line reopened and bus links to Bristol, new housing at Churchill with bus links to Bristol Airport, Weston and Bristol City Centre, new housing at Banwell and Winscombe to serve the rural community with a bus link from Weston station to Wells via Cheddar and Banwell 18 hours per day 6 days a week and a Sun
Backwell Residents Association 03 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 9072129//1
Backwell Residents Association represents over 500 residents in the village.  We are responding to the request for final comments on those unadopted sections of the Core Strategy which relate to housing numbers in the period to 2026. We have obtained the views of our members who are overwhelmingly against any proposal to develop significant new housing in the Parish. Backwell's Neighbourhood Plan, only adopted in March of this year, and which is now a binding part of Planning legislation, form
N Cooper 19 Nov 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 14206753//1
The latest numbers given relate to the Government imposed numbers, that much is clear. The revised numbers relate 2006 to 2026 and are totals. The numbers are being published in 2015 so it is necessary to make it completely clear what the numbers are representing in terms of what is yet to be given permission or seen as windfall. So publish numbers required that are yet to be given planning permission, net of windfall, IN EACH AREA (Area as defined in your table). If the latest confirmed numb
Ribbon 18 Nov 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS14 Distribution of new housing

  • Comment ID: 14394785//1
I write with regards to the potential new houses which NSC are being required to build. Is it not possible to build a completely new village near the South Bristol Link between Barrow Gurney and Yanley? I realise this is probably all greenbelt but it could easily solve the 1715 number and possible future housing requirements you have been given and infrastructure and transport would be set out at the start instead of adding to the already burgeoning service villages. Lets face it, there are many