Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

24 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
ranger 13 Dec 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Spending the CIL Q17 Do you agree that this table sets out an appropriate split between CIL and Section 106 funded infrastructure? Are there any changes you would propose?

  • Comment ID: 7756257/cil/2
  • Status: Accepted
The government clearly expects that a "meaningful proportion" of the CIL should be passed to the local parish council where one exists, and we would expect North Somerset to adhere to this proposal.
Woodland Trust 13 Dec 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Spending the CIL Q17 Do you agree that this table sets out an appropriate split between CIL and Section 106 funded infrastructure? Are there any changes you would propose?

  • Comment ID: 7754817/cil/1
  • Status: Accepted
We are pleased to see the reference to 'open space' being an eligible item for spending CIL. However we would like to see specific reference to this including green infrastructure assets like woods and trees. * The National Policy Planning Framework clearly states: 'Local planning authorities should: set out a strategic approach in their Local Plans, planning positively for the creation, protection, enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure'(DCLG, March 20
Deleted User 14 Nov 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Spending the CIL Q17 Do you agree that this table sets out an appropriate split between CIL and Section 106 funded infrastructure? Are there any changes you would propose?

  • Comment ID: 6642945/cil/6
  • Status: Accepted
Seems reasonable.
Locking Parish Council 14 Nov 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Spending the CIL Q17 Do you agree that this table sets out an appropriate split between CIL and Section 106 funded infrastructure? Are there any changes you would propose?

  • Comment ID: 2627617/cil/1
  • Status: Accepted
Further to a meeting of my Council held on Thursday 8th November 2012, please be advised that I have been asked to write to you with regard to requesting money from the Community funding Levy or alternatively from Locking Parkland's Phase 2 S106 monies for the drainage and resurfacing of the Park & Stride car park located at the Playing Fields, Old Banwell Road, Locking. This is due to the proposed (by NS) increase in people driving to and using Locking Primary School during and after their expa
First pagePrevious page