Site Allocations Plan March 2016

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

16 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 24 Jun 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Strategic Gaps SA9: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 931233//10
Core Strategy Policy CS19 establishes the need for strategic gaps and the value they bring but the wording in Policy SA9 appears to contradict by identifying what is permitted.
Deleted User 16 May 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Settlement Boundaries Policy SA1: Settlement Boundaries

  • Comment ID: 931233//2
We support the principle of development boundaries that help preserve and maintain the character and identity of towns and village but the second paragraph ‘the extension of a residential curtilage………of adjoining occupiers’ appears to counter that policy and would therefore make it more difficult to enforce. We suggest that the second paragraph is removed.
Deleted User 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Introduction Purpose of the document

  • Comment ID: 931233//1
We are disappointed that this document calls for more sites whilst at the same time sites have already been identified in the call for sites in the West of England Joint Spatial Plan. This makes the process lack transparency in terms of extent of land use proposed and so inhibits the ability of the public to have a full picture of development proposa
Deleted User 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Housing Allocations Policy SA2: Housing Allocations

  • Comment ID: 931233//3
We support the inclusion of ‘affordable housing’ in all sites.
Deleted User 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Introduction Purpose of the document

  • Comment ID: 931233//16
We note that the purpose of the Plan is to identify the detailed allocations required to deliver the North Somerset Core Strategy. We are disappointed that this document calls for more sites whilst at the same time sites have already been identified in the call for sites in the West of England Joint Spatial Plan. This makes the process lack transparency in terms of extent of land use proposed and so inhibits the ability of the public to have a full picture of development proposals.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Undesignated Green Space Policy SA8: Undesignated Green Space

  • Comment ID: 931233//9
Policy SA8 Undesignated green space We support this policy.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Community Use Allocations Policy SA10: Community use allocations

  • Comment ID: 931233//11
The policy should ensure that should there be proposals for alternative use of sites there should be no net loss of facilities for the local community.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Mixed Use Allocations Policy SA3: Mixed Use Allocations

  • Comment ID: 931233//4
We support mixed use of sites that meet the needs of the local population and recognise the constraints of individual locations and provides appropriate environmental protection and mitigation.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Weston Regeneration Area Policy SA11: Weston Regeneration Area

  • Comment ID: 931233//12
We support the town centre regeneration although we have concerns as to how this will support the current local population and their very specific needs including health and community services.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 931233//5
Sets out clear criteria but then goes on to allow for when that criteria had not been met. Presumably it would not be allocated initially if it did not meet criteria so the last two bullet points are irrelevant and should be removed.
Next pageLast page