Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

19 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Dundry in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the district.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/11
  • Status: Accepted
The restriction on affordable housing sites under this policy (in rural exceptions and allocated sites) not to be permitted should be deleted. The present requirements as set out in Policy H/5 of the current Replacement Local Plan should continue to prevail.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS35: Implementation

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
In the absence of the relevant Infrastructure Delivery Plan the right must be reserved to make further comments/representations or objections in the future when this information is made available.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/12
  • Status: Accepted
The Council's approach needs to now take into account the Government's latest planning policy and guidance set out in the recently published PPS4 : Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth. The first paragraph of the policy appears to require any development in the whole of the District, as opposed to the Weston-super-Mare area only, to be employment-led. All job creating opportunities should be encouraged and accommodated, particularly in the Weston-super-Mare area.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Core Strategy?

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
The draft core strategy document has many instances where policies have been written referring to SPDs, LDDs and other further information yet to be prepared/completed. This has made the interpretation and implications of policies difficult. The right is therefore reserved to make further comments.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS9: Green Infrastructure CS9: Green Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
In so prioritising the numbered points these should be applied having regard to both the need for flexibility and to reach a balanced conclusion in relation to all of the policy considerations associated with any planning application under consideration.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
In the third sentence of the first paragraph of this policy its meaning is unclear. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted. Reference is made to the fact that other LDDs etc will be produced to give further details. The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS26: Supporting Healthy Living and the Provision of Health Care Facilities CS26: Supporting Healthy Living and the Provision of Health Care Facilities

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
Health Impact Assessments should not be required as part of the planning application stage, adding to the already significant front-end loading (and costs) of information sought by local planning authorities. There should also be a clear definition as to what these will comprise. The requirement in point 2) of the proposed policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The scale of new housing for the District should identify land for meeting the RSS requirement of 26,750 additional units. There is no justification for the deletion of 9,000 dwellings attributable to the South West Bristol Urban Extension (SWBUE).
Next pageLast page