Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

21 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS10: Transport and Movement CS10: Transport and Movement

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed policy should be amended to include a scheme for a Tickenham/Wraxall/Nailsea by-pass or for a link to be provided at Nailsea to the Junction 20 M5 to south Bristol Link.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS22: Tourism Strategy CS22: Tourism Strategy

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
This policy should be reviewed to take on the new advice and policy guidance set out in PPS4. It should be made clear that tourism and appropriate leisure uses will not be precluded from any areas the subject of proposals in policy CS19.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
In the third sentence of the first paragraph of this policy its meaning is unclear, by virtue of its grammatical construction. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted. The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS16: Affordable Housing CS16: Affordable Housing

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
The requirement for 82% : 18% split as proposed in the wording should be more flexible so as to permit a wider range of permutations. The statement that "there will be no upper limit to the potential affordable housing provision or contribution ..." is not acceptable. The proposed imposition of a financial contribution towards the provision of affordable housing on sites of less than 15 dwellings (or sites of less than 0.5 ha) is unreasonable.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/15
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS35: Implementation

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/21
  • Status: Accepted
In the absence of the relevant Infrastructure Delivery Plan the right must be reserved to make further comments/representations or objections in the future when this information is made available.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
The words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations. In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The scale of new housing for the District should identify land for meeting the RSS requirement of 26,750 additional units. There is no justification for the deletion of 9,000 dwellings attributable to the South West Bristol Urban Extension. Irrespective of the Council's political position in respect of the SWBUE there is no reasoned justification with regard to the planning considerations to be applied that support any reduction in the total number of dwellings.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/11
  • Status: Accepted
The restriction on affordable housing sites under this policy (in rural exceptions and allocated sites) not to be permitted should be deleted. The present requirements as set out in Policy H/5 of the current Replacement Local Plan should continue to prevail.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS2: Delivering Sustainable Design and Construction CS2: Delivering Sustainable Design and Construction

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
Greater flexibility needs to be incorporated within the wording of the policy. The Council already knows that viability is a key issue particularly with the WUE. The requirements in items 2, 3 & 4 under this policy are demanding particularly in the light of the present economic circumstances.
Next pageLast page