Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

21 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS9: Green Infrastructure CS9: Green Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
In so prioritising the numbered points these should be applied having regard to both the need for flexibility and to reach a balanced conclusion in relation to all of the policy considerations associated with any planning application under consideration.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
The third sentence of the first paragraph of this policy its meaning is unclear, by virtue of its grammatical construction, should therefore be deleted. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted. General requirements for residential development to achieve Building for Life Gold standard is considered unreasonable unless subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. As stated in comments upon the previous policy, the proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS26: Supporting Healthy Living and the Provision of Health Care Facilities CS26: Supporting Healthy Living and the Provision of Health Care Facilities

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/16
  • Status: Accepted
Health Impact Assessments should not be required as part of the planning application stage, adding to the already significant front-end loading (and costs) of information sought by local planning authorities. There should also be a clear definition as to what these will comprise. The requirement in point 2) of the proposed policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The scale of new housing for the District should identify land for meeting the RSS requirement of 26,750 additional units. Irrespective of the Council's political position in respect of the SWBUE there is no reasoned justification with regard to the planning considerations to be applied that support any reduction in the total number of dwellings to be provided in the District under this policy.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must also be stated to be subject to consideration of the viability of any development proposed.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
All economic development should be positively encouraged, the comments regarding the predominance of B uses in para 3.300 are flawed and the intended strategy fails to secure the greatest range of opportunities for economic development within the District.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS22: Tourism Strategy CS22: Tourism Strategy

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
This policy should be reviewed to take on the new advice and policy guidance set out in PPS4 recently published, in particular policy EC7 therein relating to the planning of tourism in rural areas. It should be made clear that tourism and appropriate leisure uses will not be precluded from any areas the subject of proposals in policy CS19.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/17
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Next pageLast page