Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

22 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary (see other representations under policy CS14 requiring these to be retained). Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy CS20: Supporting a Successful Economy

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
The indicative employment land requirements for this policy need to be considered in conjunction with the above comments and therefore it is axiomatic that these may change in the event that such comments prevail.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/21
  • Status: Accepted
All requirements of this policy should be expressly stated to be reasonable, proportionate and have regard to the viability considerations associated with the proposed development. In the absence to the relevant SPDs or DPDs, the right must again be reserved to make further comments/representations in the future when this information is made available.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering a Prosperous Economy CS22: Tourism Strategy CS22: Tourism Strategy

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
This policy should be reviewed to take on the new advice and policy guidance set out in PPS4 recently published, in particular policy EC7 therein relating to the planning of tourism in rural areas. It should be made clear that tourism and appropriate leisure uses will not be precluded from any areas the subject of proposals in policy CS19.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS35: Implementation

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/22
  • Status: Accepted
In the absence of the relevant Infrastructure Delivery Plan the right must be reserved to make further comments/representations or objections in the future when this information is made available.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS9: Green Infrastructure CS9: Green Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
In so prioritising the numbered points these should be applied having regard to both the need for flexibility and to reach a balanced conclusion in relation to all of the policy considerations associated with any planning application under consideration.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. As stated in comments upon the previous policy, the proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/15
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS10: Transport and Movement CS10: Transport and Movement

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed policy should be amended to include a scheme for a Yatton - Congresbury by-pass.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must also be stated to be subject to consideration of the viability of any development proposed.