Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

28 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/12
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must also be stated to be subject to consideration of the viability of any development proposed.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS35: Implementation

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/27
  • Status: Accepted
1. In the absence of the relevant Infrastructure Delivery Plan the right must be reserved to make further comments/representations or objections in the future when this information is made available.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS10: Transport and Movement CS10: Transport and Movement

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
Whilst the inclusion of the schemes for Weston-super-Mare is supported, there should be clearer statements about the prioritising of such schemes and how these are to be achieved. Given the significance of the WUE proposals, it is considered therefore that the schemes under the above mentioned points should be given high priority.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS16: Affordable Housing CS16: Affordable Housing

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
The requirement for 82%:18% split as proposed in the wording should be more flexible to permit a wider range of permutations.The presumption that provision should be "without the need for public subsidy" is not reasonable and these words should be deleted."there will be no upper limit to the potential affordable housing provision or contribution ..." will not provide any reasonable guidance to developers. On-site provision maximum should be 30%. No contributions on sites of less than 15 dwelling
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS28: Weston-super-Mare CS28: Weston-super-Mare

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/21
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed allocations for 12000 new dwellings and about 10000 jobs centred on Weston-super-Mare is supported. In particular the WUE proposal is supported. It is imperative that there must be a very strong emphasis on a comprehensive and co-ordinated approach for the planning and implementation of the proposed development and the infrastructure and associated facilities required to serve the same.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only CS17: Residential Sites Providing Affordable Housing Only

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
The restriction on affordable housing sites under this policy (in rural exceptions and allocated sites) not to be permitted should be deleted. The present requirements as set out in Policy H/5 of the current Replacement Local Plan should continue to prevail.
First pagePrevious page