Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

54 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Cavanna Homes (South West) Ltd 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3324769/CSCD/16
  • Status: Accepted
Policy CS34 is confusing stating that financial contributions will be sought in the form of a standardised tariff system, but also stating that planning obligations will also be sought and negotiated from individual developments on an individual site basis. Support the notion that planning obligations, including affordable housing (paragraph 6.8) will be negotiated on a site by site basis as set out in Policy CS34 and that viability issues should be taken into account.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3563969/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
It is essential that the Council takes a pragmatic and sensible approach to Section 106 negotiations which reflects development viability and all the associated costs of development, including sustainability measures and affordable housing provision.
Highways England 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 933985/CSCD/43
  • Status: Accepted
Concerned that SPD/DPD setting out tariff requirements is still in its infancy and developments are already coming forward in Weston Regeneration Area. Tariff scheme should be established urgently to ensure opportunities for major contributions towards infrastructure such as Jcn 21 improvements are not missed.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3568545/CSCD/25
  • Status: Accepted
Whilst we accept a form of tariff maybe the appropriate way to deliver the strategic infrastructure required to support the Weston Urban Extension, the tariff needs to be backed up by a robust evidence base.St Modwen is keen to ensure that the tariff is set at a commercially deliverable level which will not preclude residential and commercial floorspace from coming forward.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 1071745/CSCD/12
  • Status: Accepted
We understand the reasoning behind the Council's intention to bring forward a district wide tariff on developer contributions. However, we consider Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) to be preferable to the council on developing its own version. The final regulations have now been published and CIL was designed in partnership with the House Builders Federation and other developers and has been consulted on at a national level.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3568545/CSCD/27
  • Status: Accepted
Whilst we accept a form of tariff maybe the appropriate way to deliver the strategic infrastructure required to support the Weston Urban Extension, the tariff needs to be backed up by a robust evidence base.St Modwen is keen to ensure that the tariff is set at a commercially deliverable level which will not preclude residential and commercial floorspace from coming forward.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3568545/CSCD/26
  • Status: Accepted
Whilst we accept a form of tariff maybe the appropriate way to deliver the strategic infrastructure required to support the Weston Urban Extension, the tariff needs to be backed up by a robust evidence base.St Modwen is keen to ensure that the tariff is set at a commercially deliverable level which will not preclude residential and commercial floorspace from coming forward.
Deleted User 18 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3359425/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The wider regeneration benefits of redevelopment and quantum of floorspace which already exists on site should be recognised when considering the scope and scale of contributions for the site. Any Section 106 requirements should also have regard to the viability and delivery of schemes in light of the economic downturn. Kilmartin are concerned that a lack of flexibility could compromise the delivery of key regeneration initiatives.
Rachel Coxcoon 17 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 3326849/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
Pg 165 Policy CS34: Developer Contributions. It should be made clear that developers will be expected to contribute to renewable energy infrastructure as well as the more standard transport, leisure etc.
Mendip Hills AONB unit 16 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS34: Developer Contributions to Infrastructure

  • Comment ID: 698049/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
Policy CS34 is supported.
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page