Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

46 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
ianbennett 12 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 3314305/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
The more sustainable approach to development in the rural areas should make provision for significant housing growth to help build in 'sustainability' ie to ensure continuing demand for schools, post offices,shops, pubs etc. Without balanced private housing growth, the aspiration for growth of employment and particularly services and facilities will not be credible.
Backwell Parish Council 12 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1013153/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
Chapter 4 - Area Policies: Backwell Parish Council support the aims and are happy that Backwell is classed as a service village. The emphasis on employment in Nailsea and keeping the green open space is also a priority.
Deleted User 12 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1014881/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
Development on even the smallest scale is over development and unsuitable use of Green Belt land. It is fully in agreement with Area Policy CS32, Service village/pages 149/150. Boundaries of service villages should be protected and development in gardens of large properties should be resisted.
DMC 01 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 3249665/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
I am shocked that you are prepared to stand by and allow the Hillyfields/Well Close site be promoted for this type of development when other potential available sites have not been properly assessed or investigated. No sites outside the village boundary and in the AONB should be considered for development at all for any purpose.
Tom Leimdorfer 27 Jan 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 936033/CSCD/12
  • Status: Accepted
I broadly support this strategy. With respect to Congresbury, the vacant site of the former Elliott's works presents a 'one-off' development opportunity within the settlement boundary for a mixed employment and residential site. Congresbury Parish Council supported my outline suggestions for the site (attached) and we have also had positive feedback from several residents.
Deleted User 10 Jan 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 3164577/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
The siting of affordable housing schemes in Service Villages needs to be clarified. Residents of the Service Villages need to be consulted about your plans to focus development there.
First pagePrevious page