Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

40 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. Winscombe should be considered to be a market town and the subject of this policy.
Environment Agency 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 1020673/CSCD/50
  • Status: Accepted
Para 4.87 - Does this refer to infill, redevelopment and subdivision, which confirms what NSC previously stated? But if additional housing is required in this area due to revised growth figures NSC SFRA Level 2 will need to be updated to ensure there is sufficient technical evidence to support this growth area. NSC needs to clarify its position.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/23
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, consequential amendments will be required to this policy to give effect to same. In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3370849/CSCD/21
  • Status: Accepted
In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. Land on the north west side of Nailsea is available and would be suitable for development should it be required to meet some element of the strategic developments needs of the district.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3331489/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
Need to identify additional land for office use particularly in locations where take-up rates have been encouraging. Opportunity for land at Portished to be allocated.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3399393/CSCD/11
  • Status: Accepted
We consider that Yatton complies with the criteria in policy B of the PCRSS. We propose that Yatton should be identified as a Market/Coastal Town. Yatton should be identified to provide: - up to 1,000 dwellings in the period 2010-2026 in order to meet the PCRSS requirement to deliver 5,750 dwellings within the remainder of the District. - up to 10 ha of employment land for B1, B2 and B8 uses in the period 2010-2026.
Friends of Suburban Bristol Ra… 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3329249/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
FOSBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) urges that the words 'rapid transit' should be deleted from the sentence: 'For Portishead the re-opening of a rail/rapid transit link to Bristol is a priority'. See our fuller comments under CS10.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3321025/CSCD/3
  • Status: Accepted
Clevedon, Nailsea & Portishead account for 30% of the population of North Somerset. To severely limit the growth of these towns will lead to the loss of employment and community land to housing, leading to out-commuting and less self-containment. The release of Green Belt land on the north-eastern edge of Portishead for housing and employment will help to sustain the town and will be essential to the re-opening of the Portishead/Bristol rail link. The strategy is therefore unsound.
Baker Family (West Nailsea) 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3564385/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, consequential amendments will be required to this policy to give effect to same. In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. Land on the west side of Nailsea is available and would be suitable for development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
Should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. Land on the north side of Nailsea is available and would be suitable for development should it be required to meet some element of the strategic developments needs of the district.