Site Allocations Plan March 2016

Comment ID 14823361//2
Document Section Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 4: Proposed sites for Local Green Space Congresbury View all on this section
Respondent Deleted User View all by this respondent
Response Date 27 Apr 2016
Comment

The assessment of LGS and subsequent review does not appear to be consistent across the district. The decision to amend the boundary to the milenium green in Congresbury is subjective and arbitrary for example. If this important community asset cannot be treated as one site then then the southern area should be designated separately. This small area is a community orchard with historic relavance. The Congresbury Beauty Apple is one of a dozen specimen local Apple trees planted here. The land is a wildlife area created as mitigation for the less sensitive management of the amenity area. Where is the justification for the change? Who has made the decision and why?

The NPPF guidance is not that specific. This appears to be bureaucratic nitpicking.

Attachments