Site Allocations Plan March 2016

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

7 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 29 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 2930529//1
We object to this policy approach as it unnecessarily restricts potential development opportunities, including in particular the development of supporting uses commonly found at business parks such as Hotels, public houses, small scale convenience and snack/sandwich and hot drink establishments. These all deliver employment which whilst not B1, deliver significant employment and also contribute significantly to the attractiveness, diversity of business parks to potential B class users.
Persimmon Homes Severn Valley 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 14590529//15
Suggested revisions to Policy SA4.
Wrington Parish Council 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 1019201//13
We are broadly supportive of this Policy provided that the factors set out in the bullet points on pages 22 and 23 are clearly and directly linked to the Policy
Wrington Parish Council 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 1019201//1
We are broadly supportive of this Policy provided that the factors set out in the bullet points on pages 22 and 23 are clearly and directly linked to the Policy. Therefore, the Policy wording should be revised accordingly to ensure that there can be no doubt about the need to assess each site’s suitability.
Nailsea Action Group 27 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 14823809//13
Lack of employment allocations at Nailsea will exacerbate commuting issues.
Deleted User 27 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 8141345//4
We have no concerns with this policy and are generally supportive of allowing non B uses on sites in accordance with the criteria identified.
Deleted User 24 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Employment Policy SA4: Employment Allocations

  • Comment ID: 931233//5
Sets out clear criteria but then goes on to allow for when that criteria had not been met. Presumably it would not be allocated initially if it did not meet criteria so the last two bullet points are irrelevant and should be removed.