Core Strategy - Consultation Draft
List Comments
40 comments.
| Respondent | Response Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Family (West Nailsea) | 18 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms.There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Dundry Parish Council | 18 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Policy supported with the following comment:_
Dundry is close to Bristol and a strategic gap needs to be preserved (3.289) and (3.290).
|
| Deleted User | 16 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
It is suggested that green wedges/strategic gaps are identified and maintained between all villages surrounding Congresbury, not just the obvious ones like Yatton & Congresbury.
|
| Mendip Hills AONB unit | 16 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Policy CS19 is supported.
|
| Deleted User | 15 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Would also like to express a very strong preference for the maintenance of green wedges between settlements so that they do not lose their individual identity and to provide opportunities for residents to experience green open space without recourse to mechanised transport. The given list of settlements for which such wedges are needed (3.290) seems to cover those settlements in most need of imminent protection in this manner.
|
| Deleted User | 15 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
SMALL PARCELS OF LAND (corner plots etc)
There should be provision, if needed, for these to be used for growing food.
|
| Deleted User | 15 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
This policy is warmly welcomed. The prevention of the coalescence of settlements is critical to the preservation of their distinct identities. KSPC requests that the location "between Yatton and Clevedon" is added to para 3.290 and included in the site Allocations DPD; there are already signs of "development creep" between Yatton (North End) and Kingston Seymour / Kenn, and between Kenn and Clevedon.
|
| CLIFF DUMBELL | 14 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Protect the integrity of existing settlements
|
| CLIFF DUMBELL | 14 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Protect the integrity of existing settlements
|
| Deleted User | 11 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Support for this proposal in particular between Nailsea and Backwell.
|