Core Strategy - Consultation Draft
List Comments
40 comments.
| Respondent | Response Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Deleted User | 22 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either the land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should be deleted.
There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
1. CS19 should be deleted, tantamount to green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same. Either such land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted.
2. Lck of clear guidance upon appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone. Inclusion of area between Weston-super-Mare and Hutton is not accepted.
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
We object to this policy as there is no basis for the designation of Green Wedges and Strategic Gaps within PPS1, PPS7 or the PCRSS.
For these reasons we object to this policy and seek its deletion as it fails to meet test of soundness as it is not consistent with national planning policy or in general conformity with the Regional Spatial Strategy.
|
| Alvis and Bennett Families | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
1. The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing Green Belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either such land is worthy of Green Belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted.
2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
Policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions. Either the land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside.
2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|
| Wrington Parish Council | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
This policy is supported. No further comment.
|
| Bristol Water | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
We believe that this emerging policy should refer to the protection of green wedges and strategic gaps '...that help to retain the separate identity...'
|
| Deleted User | 19 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps
1. The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either such land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted.
2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
|