Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

40 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 931361/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either the land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should be deleted. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3591457/CSCD/11
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3597441/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
1. CS19 should be deleted, tantamount to green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same. Either such land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted. 2. Lck of clear guidance upon appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone. Inclusion of area between Weston-super-Mare and Hutton is not accepted.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3590945/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3399393/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
We object to this policy as there is no basis for the designation of Green Wedges and Strategic Gaps within PPS1, PPS7 or the PCRSS. For these reasons we object to this policy and seek its deletion as it fails to meet test of soundness as it is not consistent with national planning policy or in general conformity with the Regional Spatial Strategy.
Alvis and Bennett Families 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3579585/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
1. The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing Green Belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either such land is worthy of Green Belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted. 2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
Policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions. Either the land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside. 2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Wrington Parish Council 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 1019201/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
This policy is supported. No further comment.
Bristol Water 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 933697/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
We believe that this emerging policy should refer to the protection of green wedges and strategic gaps '...that help to retain the separate identity...'
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3590177/CSCD/15
  • Status: Accepted
1. The proposed policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions in areas without the need to justify same in planning terms. Either such land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside; the policy should therefore be deleted. 2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.